Isnt wrestling completely unfair? i mean a wrestler has no control over improving his/her win loss record.?

the wrestlers are told to lose or win a match, so technically being a 10 time champ like hhh doesnt mean a thing. true or false?Isnt wrestling completely unfair? i mean a wrestler has no control over improving his/her win loss record.?
True and it is not what I would like to see. It all started in the WWF days. When certain wrestlers needed fame and popularity to make the big bucks for the Federation, like Hulk Hogan, Randy Savage and Bret Hart and so on....Isnt wrestling completely unfair? i mean a wrestler has no control over improving his/her win loss record.?
Its a show....not a real competitive sport.
If professional wrestling entertainment was competitive and not entertainment, then it would be completely unfair.





But it's not competitive, it is nearly completely scripted. And yes, every wrestler's championship reigns mean something. True, champions are chosen, but they only last as long as a fued or series of matches interests the fans, or until the next new things come along. If floks didn't either love or love to hate HHH, he wouldn't have been champion as many times as he has.





To me it's no different than watching your favorite prime time drama, or cartoon on saturday, or reading a book of fiction, or watch a movie on the big screen. Technically, all of those are fake, made up, with a pre-determined ending. But they can be enjoyable.





Take it all with a grain of salt and just enjoy the mayhem.
TRUE. Absolutely.
I think it's fan based if they love you or they hate you whatever gets the fans into it
that is why it is sports entertainment.
It would be interesting to know the inside politics of wrestling.
oh freakin well. HHH is awesome and is gonna kick your @$$!!!!
i think that the backstage stuff is staged but i dont think that the matches are fixed